Gorringe v Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council [2004] UKHL 15 What are the recommended :Economics, 1. Sell your Smith Wesson Governor for FREE today on GunsAmerica! Smith v Hughes (1871) LR 6 QB 597 Williams v Cawardine[1833] EWHC KB J44 Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (nature of locality) What if it is in :Economics, 1. White v John Warwick [1953] 1 WLR 1285 Woodward v Mayor of Hastings [1945] KB 174, X & Y v Hounslow London Borough Council [2009] EWCA Civ 286, Yorkshire Traction Co v Walter Searby [2003] EWCA Civ 1856 Lambert v Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd [1975] 2 Lloyds Rep 485 Dimmock v Hallett (186667) LR 2 Ch App 21 The US Medical Department. Evans v Triplex Safety Glass [1936] 1 All ER 283, F v West Berkshire Health Authority [1989] 2 AC 1 Historically, personal injury claims have been allowed, as in Hale v Jennings. Avon Finance v Bridger [1985] 2 All ER 281 Depp v News Group Newspapers [2020] EWHC 2911 In Perry v Kendricks (1956), the claim was unconnected . As water is likely to do mischief if it escapes - and this water did escape out of the reservoir and down the mineshafts - the defendant was liable for all the damages that were a natural consequence of that mistake. 226 Wilson v Pringle [1987] QB 237 Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (Foreseeable Damage) Reynolds v Clarke (1725) 92 ER 410 The Wagon Mound (No 1) [1961] AC 388 Employers Liability City and Westminster Properties (1934) Ltd v Mudd [1959] Ch 129 Jaggard v Sawyer [1995] 1 WLR 269 The Mihalis Angelos [1970] EWCA Civ 4 Buy a Gold Tip KSNG890400 Provides the performance of the 100 percent carbon Velocity line, but with a smaller price tag. Phelps v Hillingdon Borough Council [2000] UKHL 47 St Helens Smelting Co v Tipping [1865] UKHL J81 Private Nuisance (physical damage) Keown v Coventry Healthcare NHS Trust [2006] EWCA Civ 39 2d 116, (S.D.N.Y. Hyde v Wrench(1840) 49 ER 132 (Mirror Image) Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 Vicarious Liability Alan v El Nasr[1972] 2 WLR 800 Pape v Cumbria County Council [1992] I.C.R. Goldman v Hargrave [1967] Ch 647 Reeves v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2000] 1 AC 360 General Duty of Care Knowles v Liverpool City Council [1993] 1 WLR 1428 Jones v Padavatton[1969] 1 WLR 328 Harvela Investments v Royal Trust Company of Canada [1986] AC 207 Twine v Bean Express [1946] 1 All ER 202, Vacwell Engineering v BDH Chemicals [1971] 1 QB 88 This is the home page for the family trees of WMGS Members. of State, in pursuance of a resolution of Congress, of the 27th of April, 1816 . Rylands v Fletcher [1868] UKHL 1, Salmon v Seafarer Restaurant [1983] 1 WLR 1264 Condor v Baron Knights[1966] 1 WLR 87 Payzu v Saunders[1919] 2 KB 581 Stansbie v Troman [1948] 2 KB 48 Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11 By continuing to browse this website, you declare to accept the use of cookies. The Rule in Rylands v Fletcher and relevant cases. Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 General Duty of Care (Rescuers) Saunders v Anglia Building Society [1970]UKHL 5 Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2018] UKSC 4 General Duty of Care Hale v Jennings Bros [1948] 1 All ER 579 A car from a chair- o-plane ride on a fairground became detached from the main assembly while it was in motion and injured a stallholder as it crashed to the ground. Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (General) In the matter of color: Race and the American legal process: The colonial period. Hartog v Colin & Shields [1939] 3 All ER 566 Robert Addie & Son v Dumbreck [1929] AC 358 Dooley v Cammell Laird [1951] 1 Lloyds Rep 271 2023 Digestible Notes All Rights Reserved. Her Rylands v Fletcher claim was based upon the tenancy of her stall. Slipper v BBC [1991] 1 All ER 165 Muirhead v Industrial Tank Specialists [1986] QB 507 Product Liability Couturier v Hastie(1856) 5 HLC 673 We believe that human potential is limitless if you're willing to put in the work. Errington v Errington & Woods [1952] 1 KB 290 (Unilateral Offers) Farrow v Wilson (1869) LR 4 CP 744 Davis Contractors v Fareham UDC [1956] AC 696 Holbeck Hall v Scarborough Borough Council [2000] 2 All ER 705 Roe v Ministry of Health [1954] 2 WLR 915 Remoteness Clifford v Charles H Challen [1951] 1 KB 495 Godfrey v Demon Internet [1999] EWHC QB 240 McAlpine v Bercow [2013] EWHC 1342 (QB) Reynolds v Atherton (1921) 125 LT 690 Partridge v Crittenden (1968) 2 All ER 421 The consent submitted will only be used for data processing originating from this website. Past earthquakes in West Hale Township, Kansas, USA: February 2023 - list, stats and map. Nichols v Marsland (1876) 2 ExD 1 Robinson v Harman (1848) 1 Ex Rep 850 Stone v Taffe [1974] 1 WLR 1575 Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1 Harrison v British Rail Board [1981] 3 All ER 679 Smith v Charles Baker & Sons [1891] AC 325 Employers Liability The Atlantic Baron, North Ocean Shipping v Hyundai Construction [1979] QB 705 Hollywood Silver Fox Farm v Emmett [1936] 2 KB 468 Esso Petroleum v Mardon [1976] QB 801 In Hale v. Jennings Brothers, Scott, LJ, referred to the rule as "a broad principle that the liability attaches because of the occupier of the land bringing onto the land something which is likely to do damage if it escapes". One of the chairs flew off and injured the claimant. Mullins v Richards [1998] 1 WLR 1304 Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (planning permission) The Universe Sentinel,Universe Tankships Inc. of Monrovia v. International Transport Workers Federation[1983] 1AC 366, Vanbergen v St Edmund Properties[1933] 2 KB 223 ICI v Shatwell [1965] AC 656 Defences Nicholl and Knight v Ashton, Eldridge & Co [1901] 2 KB 126 Shirlaw v Southern Foundries [1939] 2 KB 206 Coulthart v Clementson (1879) 5 QBD 42 If you would like to change your settings or withdraw consent at any time, the link to do so is in our privacy policy accessible from our home page.. Watt v Hertfordshire County Council [2000] 2 WLR 601 Long v Lloyd[1958] 1 WLR 753 Are any employees or workers at greater risk. Jameel v Wall Street Journal [2003] EWCA Civ 1694 Cutler v United Dairies [1933] 2 KB 297 Defences, Daniels v Whetstone [1962] 2 Lloyds Rep 1 Bowerman v Association of British Travel Agents [1996] CLC 451 Hammond v Osborn [2002] EWCA Civ 885 Webb v Barclays Bank; Webb v Portsmouth Hospitals Trust NHS Trust [2001] Lloyds Rep Med 500 2d 116, (S.D.N.Y. Humber Oil Terminal Trustees v Sivand [1998] EWCA Civ 100 Murphy v Brentwood District Council [1991] UKHL 2 The case mentions the flood was one of extraordinary violence, but floods of extraordinary violence must be anticipated as events that are likely to take place from time to time, Facts: The claimant tended a booth at a fair belonging to the claimant. Rose & Frank v Crompton Bros[1925] AC 445 (The Sibeon & The Sibotre) Occidental Worldwide Investment v Skibs [1976] 1 Lloyds Rep 293 Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] AC 789 Abouzaid v Mothercare [2000] All ER (D) 246 Scott v Shepherd (1865) 3 Hurlstone and Coltman 596 roll tide urban dictionary; judy siebel; bear paw tubing alligators; lip blushing gone wrong; famous duos with charlie; is lynwood ca ghetto; is lobo . Balfour v Balfour[1919] 2 KB 571 McFarlane v EE Caledonia [1993] EWCA Civ 13 Hale G. E. (1998). This was held to amount to an escape for the purposes of Rylands v Fletcher. Hurley v Dyke [1979] RTR 265 Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] 1 AC 1074 Clinical Negligence (standard) Paris v Stepney Borough Council [1951] AC 367 Employers Liability Zurich Insurance PLC UK Branch v International Energy Group Limited [2015] UKSC 33. Transco v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council [2002] 2 AC 1 Rylands v Fletcher (non-natural use) Stilk v Myrick (1809) 2 Cams 317 Cassidy v Daily Mirror Newspapers [1929] 2 KB 331 Lillie v Newcastle City Council [2002] EWHC 1600 (QB) Spartan Steel & Alloys v Martin & Co [1973] 1 QB 27 Lewis v Avery[1971] 3 WLR 603 Hastings v Finsbury Orthopaedics Ltd [2019] CSOH 96 Gough v Thorne [1966] 1 WLR 1387 North Glamorgan NHS Trust v Walters [2002] EWCA 1792, OShea v Mirror Group Newspapers [2001] EMLR 943 666, Bunn & Bunn v Rees & Parker [2002]All ER (D) 81, Butler Machine Tool v Ex-Cell-O Corp[1979] 1 WLR 401, Canada Steamship Lines v The King [1952] AC 192, Car & Universal Credit v Caldwell [1964] 2 WLR 600, Carillion Construction v Felix [2001] BLR 1, Carlill v Carbolic Smokeball Company [1893] 1 QB 256 Offers, Carlill v Carbolic Smokeball Company [1893] 1 QB 256 Intention, Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi, The Cenk Kaptanoglu, Progress Bulk Carriers v Tube City [2012] EWHC 273 (Comm), Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd[1947] KB 130, Chwee Kin Keong v Digilandmall.com [2006] 1 LRC 37, City and Westminster Properties (1934) Ltd v Mudd [1959] Ch 129, Co-op Insurance Society v Argyll Stores[1997] 2 WLR 898, Countess of Dunmore v Alexander (1830) 9 S. 190, CTN Cash & Carry v Gallagher[1994] 4 All ER 714, Curtis v Chemical Cleaning & Dyeing[1951] 1 KB 805, Currie v Misa (1875) LR 10 Ex 153, (1876) 1 App Cas 554, Daulia v Four Millbank Nominees[1978] Ch 231, Davis Contractors v Fareham UDC [1956] AC 696, Denny, Mott & Dickson Ltd v James B Fraser & Co Ltd [1944] AC 265, Dick Bentley Productions v Harold Smith Motors[1965] 1 WLR 623, Dickinson v Dodds (1876) 2 Ch D 463 Revocation by offeror, Dickinson v Dodds (1876) 2 Ch D 463 Revocation by third party, Dimmock v Hallett (186667) LR 2 Ch App 21, Dolphin Maritime & Aviation Services Ltd v Sveriges Angfartygs Assurans Forening (The Swedish Club) [2009] EWHC 716, DSND Subsea v Petroleum Geo Services [2000] BLR 530, Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd[1914] UKHL 1, Dunlop Pneumatic Tyres Co Ltd v Selfridge and Co Ltd[1915] UKHL 1, Edgington v Fitzmaurice(1885) 29 Ch D 459, Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corp[1955] 2 QB 327, Erlanger v New Sombrero Phosphate Co (1878) 3 App Cas 1218, Errington v Errington & Woods [1952] 1 KB 290 (Unilateral Offers), Errington v Errington & Woods[1952] 1 KB 290 (Revocation), Esso Petroleum v Commissioners of Customs & Excise[1976] 1 WLR 1, The Eurymedon, New Zealand Shipping Co Ltd v A M Sattherthwaite & Co [1975] AC 154, George Mitchell (Chesterhall) Ltd v Finney Lock Seeds [1983] 2 AC 803, Gibson v Manchester City Council [1979] 1 WLR 294, Glasbrook Bros Ltd v Glamorgan County Council[1925] AC 270, Golden Strait Corporation v Nippon Yusen Kubishika Kaisha [2007] UKHL 12, Granville Oil & Chemicals Ltd. v Davis Turner & Co. Ltd. [2003] EWCA Civ 570, Great Northern Railway Company v Witham (1873) LR 9 CP 16, Great Peace Shipping Ltd v Tsavliris (International) Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 1407, Grogan v Robin Meredith Plant Hire [1996] CLC 1127, Harlington & Leinster v Christopher Hull Fine Art [1991] 1 QB 564, Hartog v Colin & Shields [1939] 3 All ER 566, Harvela Investments v Royal Trust Company of Canada [1986] AC 207, Harvey v Ventilatorenfabrik Oelde (1988) 8 Tr L 138, Hearne Bay Steam Ship v Hutton [1903] 2 KB 683, Hollier v Rambler Motors[1972] 2 WLR 401, Holwell Securities v Hughes[1974] 1 WLR 155, Hong Kong Fir Shipping v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha [1962] 2 QB 26, Houghton v Trafalgar Insurance [1954] 1 QB 247, Household Fire & Accident Insurance v Grant (1879) 4 ExD 216, Hughes v Metropolitan Railway(1876-77) LR 2 App Cas 439, Huyton SA v Peter Cremer [1999] 1 Lloyds Rep 620, Hyde v Wrench(1840) 49 ER 132 (Mirror Image), Hyde v Wrench(1840) 49 ER 132 (Counter Offer), Inntrepreneur Pub Co v East Crown [2000] 2 Lloyds Rep 611, Interfoto Picture Library v Stilletto [1989] QB 433, J Evans v Andrea Merzario [1976] 1 WLR 1078, Jackson v Horizon Holidays[1975] 1 WLR 1468, Jackson v Union Marine Insurance (1874) 10 Common Pleas 125, Jones v Vernons Pools [1938] 2 All ER 626, Keates v Earl of Cadogan (1851) 10 CB 591, Kings Norton Metal co ltd v Edridge, Merrett & co ltd (1897) 14 TLR 98, Kolmar Group v Traxpo Enterprises [2010] EWHC 113 (Comm), Lambert v Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd [1975] 2 Lloyds Rep 485, Leaf v International Galleries [1950] 2 KB 86 (Mistake), Leaf v International Galleries [1950] 2 KB 86 (Equitable Remedies), Leonard v Pepsico, 88 F. Supp. Jennifer Love Hewitt - of heavily English descent. Re McArdle(1951) Ch 669 Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] Monson v Madame Tussauds [1894] 1 QB 671 The owner of the ride was held liable. This was held that it amounted to escape and that the defendant was liable for the personal injury sustained. The Wagon Mound (No 1) [1961] AC 388 Remoteness Rickards v Lothian [1913] AC 263 Smith v Chadwick (1884) 9 App Cas 187 Harvey v Ventilatorenfabrik Oelde (1988) 8 Tr L 138 British Chiropractic Association v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350 R v Cotesworth (1704) 6 Mod Currie v Misa (1875) LR 10 Ex 153, (1876) 1 App Cas 554 Tolley v JS Fry [1931] AC 333 Chester v Ashfar [2004] 3 WLR 927 Banco de Portugal v Waterlow [1932] All ER Rep 181 O ' cine d'aventuras ye un chenero cinematografico caracterizau por a presencia d'un heroi (ficticio u real) inspirador d'un mito, a on gosa haber-ie scenas d'aventuras y batallas, asobn de tipo caballeresco y que gosa tamin estar ambientau en epocas pasadas que se presentan de forma exalzadora, en presentando sin . Cas. Spurling Ltd v Bradshaw [1956] EWCA 3 BarryvDavies [2001] All ER 944 Wilkinson v Downton [1897] 2 QB 57 The Chislehurst Society. Ashton v Turner [1981] l QB Parker v South Eastern Railway [1877] 2 CPD 416 Meering v Grahame-White Aviation (1919) 122 LT 44 Rigby v Chief Constable of Northamptonshire [1985] 2 All ER 986 Public Nuisance Sayers v Harlow Urban District Council [1958] 1 WLR 623 The sum found to have been obtained in the later trial vastly exceeded the sum the defendant said had ever come within his control or benefit. Household Fire & Accident Insurance v Grant (1879) 4 ExD 216 Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi[2015] UKSC 67 Henderson v Arthur [1907] 1 KB 10 Dunlop Pneumatic Tyres Co Ltd v Selfridge and Co Ltd[1915] UKHL 1, Eastwood v Kenyon (1840) 11 AD & El 438 Cutler v United Dairies [1933] 2 KB 297 General Duty of Care Founded in 1881. Sugar v London, Midland & Scottish Railway [1941] 1 All ER 172 Biennial 1816-1831. A large water supply pipe nearby broke, and very substantial volumes of water escaped, causing the embankment to slip, and the gas main to fracture. Milne v Express Newspapers [2005] 1 WLR 772 Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 General Duty of Care 2. Farrington v Leigh [1959] VR 286 Bourhill v Young [1943] AC 92 George Mitchell (Chesterhall) Ltd v Finney Lock Seeds [1983] 2 AC 803 Persimmon Homes Limited v Ove Arup[2017] EWCA Civ 373 The imaginative and intelligent collections created in the 1980s and 1990s by Gianni Versace (1946-1997) have earned him a position of prominence in the history of late-twentieth century fashion. Bailey v Ministry of Defence [2008] EWCA Civ 883 Causation Baird Textile Holdings Ltd v Marks & Spencer Plc Court of Appeal [2001] EWCA Civ 274 Huth v Huth [1915] 3 KB 32, ICI v Shatwell [1965] AC 656 Employers Liability Reeves v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2000] 1 AC 360 Defences Mansfield v Weetabix [1997] EWCA Civ 1352 What is the fourth part of the R v F test? Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) Jones v Vernons Pools [1938] 2 All ER 626, Keates v Earl of Cadogan (1851) 10 CB 591 Facts: In this case the police were chasing an armed psychopath who had locked himself in a gun shop. See also Aldridge v Van Patter [1952] 4 DLR 93; Schubert v Sterling Trust [1943] 4 DLR 584; Benning v Wong (1969) 122 CLR 249; Perry v Kendrick's Transport [1956] 1 WLR 85. Knightley v Jones [1982] 1 WLR 349 Bettini v Gye(1876) QBD 183 Vellino v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police [2002] 1 WLR 218 Appleby v Myers (1867) LR 2 CP 65 1 Google Scholar Higginbotham A. L. (1978). Water escaped into nearby disused mineshafts, and in turn flooded the plaintiffs mine. Allcard v Skinner (1887) 36 Ch D 145 Vesta v Butcher [1988] 1 Lloyds Rep 19 Crown Prosecution Service v Jennings: HL 14 May 2008 The appellant appealed against the refusal to discharge a restraint order under the 1988 Act. Vowles v Evans [2003] 1 WLR 1607, W v Essex County Council [2000] 2 WLR 601 Rickards v Lothian (water supply is natural usage) Bonnington Castings v Wardlaw [1956] AC 613 However, the court said that the defendant was liable anyway under this new rule the court made. Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council [2003] 3 WLR 705 Date from caption usually one year later than report date on t.p. Perry v Butlins Holiday World (1998) This website provides information and opinions for study purposes only, it should not be used for legal advice of any kind. Adams v Ursell [1913] 1 Ch 269 Must be 'an escape from a place where the defendant has occupation of, or control over, land to a place which is outside his occupation or control'. Lumley v Wagner (1852) 42 ER 687, MacInnes v Gross [2017] EWHC 46 (QB) Bellew v Irish Cement [1948] IR 61 Mulcahy v Ministry of Defence [1996] 2 WLR 474 Al-Fagih v HH Saudi Research and Marketing (UK) Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1634 Company: Toyota North America Research 308 Park Ave Nw, Canton, OH, We're 100% Free! L.R. Gibson v Manchester City Council [1979] 1 WLR 294 Derbyshire County Council v Times Newspapers [1993] AC 534 Felthouse v Bindley[1862] EWHC CP J35 Held: The defendant . Barclays Bank v O Brien[1994] 1 AC 180 Undue Influence (3rd Party) Sumpter v Hedges [1898] 1 QB 673, Tate v Williamson (1886) LR 2 Ch App 55 Tekdata Interconnections Ltd v Amphenol Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1209 Hale v Jennings Bros: 1938 The owner of the fairground was held to be responsible for a chair-o-plane which became detached from the roundabout, because the act of the man 'fooling about on this device' was: 'just the kind of behaviour which ought to have been anticipated as being a likely act with a percentage of users of the apparatus.' Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1997] 3 WLR 1151 Clinical Negligence Wells v Cooper (1958) 2 All ER 527 British Crane Hire v Ipswich Plant Hire[1975] QB 303 Etheridge v East Sussex County Council [1999] Ed CR 550 Crawford v Charing Cross Hospital (The Times, 8 December 1953) Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2018] UKSC 4 Public Body Duty of Care Roberts v Chief Constable of Cheshire [1999] EWCA Civ 655 Revill v Newbury [1996] 2 WLR 239 Occupiers Liability In some cases in the first half of the 20th century plaintiffs recovered damages under the rule for personal injury: Shiffman v St John of Jerusalem (Grand Priory in the British Realm of the Venerable Order of the Hospital) [1936] 1 All ER 557; Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] 1 All ER 579 are examples. Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 Employers Liability Chwee Kin Keong v Digilandmall.com [2006] 1 LRC 37 Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1936] AC 85 Lombard North Central plc v Butterworth [1987] 1 All ER 267 666 Morgan v Manser [1948] 1 KB 184 Swinney v Chief Constable of Northumbria (No 2) [1996] EWCA Civ 1322 General Duty of Care McLoughlin v OBrian [1982] UKHL 3. An Informer v A Chief Constable An Informer v A Chief Constable (2012) One of the chairs broke loose and hit the claimant. HELD: This was an escape because D had control over the circumstances (in this case the chair-o-plane machine). Lagden v OConnor [2003] UKHL 64 Mughal v Reuters, Times 10-Nov-1993 Smith v Stages [1989] AC 928 Report year ends Sept. 30. Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services [2002] 3 WLR 89 Scotson v Pegg[1861] EWHC Exch J2 Corby Group Litigation v Corby District Council [2008] EWCA Civ 463 $16.99 1 New from $16.99 The first-ever middle-grade anthology from Marvel Comics, featuring all-new comics stories by 15 all-star cartoonists Welcome to the Marvel Universe and the World Outside Your Window! Applause Stores Productions v Raphael [2008] EWHC 1781 (QB) Held: It was held that there was no escape (a requirement of the tort) as the injury happened at the factory. Tamiz v Google Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 68 Spicer v Smee [1946] 1 All ER 489 Mondial Shipping v Astarte Shipping [1995] CLC 1011 . :Economics. Woodar Investment Development Ltd v Wimpey Construction UK Ltd [1980] 1 WLR 277 R v Ireland [1997] 3 WLR 534 Haseldine v Daw [1941] 2 KB 343 Occupiers Liability 5 of 10. Thompson v London, Midland and Scottish Railway Co Ltd [1930] 1 KB 41 1999), Linden Gardens Trust v Lenesta Sludge Disposal[1993] UKHL 4, Lombard North Central plc v Butterworth [1987] 1 All ER 267, Macklin and others v Dowsett [2004] EWCA Civ 904, Maritime National Fish v Ocean Trawlers [1935] AC 524, Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd [2015] UKSC 72, McAlpine Construction v Panatown [2001] 1 AC 518, McInerny v Lloyds Bank [1974] 1 Lloyds Rep 246, McRae v Commonwealth Disposals Commission (1951) 84 CLR 377, Midland Bank Plc v Shephard [1988] 3 All ER 17, Monarch Airlines v London Luton Airport [1997] CLC 698, Mondial Shipping v Astarte Shipping [1995] CLC 1011, Museprime Properties v Adhill Properties (1990) 36 EG 114, National Carriers v Panalpina [1981] A.C. 675, National Westminster Bank v Morgan [1985] AC 686, Nicholl and Knight v Ashton, Eldridge & Co [1901] 2 KB 126, Olley v Marlborough Court [1949] 1 KB 532, Omnium DEnterprises v Sutherland [1919] 1 KB 618, Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams[1957] 1 WLR 370, Page One Records v Britton [1968] 1 WLR 157, Pankhania v London Borough of Hackney [2002] EWHC 2441, Parker v South Eastern Railway [1877] 2 CPD 416, Partridge v Crittenden (1968) 2 All ER 421, Peekay Intermark Ltd v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 386, Persimmon Homes Limited v Ove Arup[2017] EWCA Civ 373, Pharmaceutical Society v Boots [1953] 1 QB 401, Photolibrary Group v Burda Senator Verlag [2008] EWHC 1343 (QB), Pickfords v Celestica [2003] EWCA Civ 1741, R v Attorney-General for England & Wales[2003] UKPC 22, R&B Custom Brokers Co Ltd v United Dominions Trust Ltd [1998] 1 WLR 321, Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v Montefiore(1866) LR 1 Ex 109, Reveille Independent v Anotech International [2010] EWCA Civ 443, Rose & Frank v Crompton Bros[1925] AC 445, Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge(No 2) [1998] 4 All ER 705, Rust v Abbey Life Insurance Co [1979] 2 Lloyds Rep 334, Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth [1995]UKHL 8, Salt v Stratstone Specialist Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 745, Saunders v Anglia Building Society [1970]UKHL 5, Scammell and Nephew v Ouston [1941] AC 251, Scheps v Fine Art Logistic Ltd [2007] EWHC 541, The Sea Angel, Edwinton Commercial Corp v Tsavliris Russ [2007] EWCA Civ 547, Shanklin Pier v Detel Products [1951] 2 KB 854, Shell UKv Lostock Garage Limited [1976] 1 WLR 1187, Shirlaw v Southern Foundries [1939] 2 KB 206, Shogan Finance v Hudson [2003] 3 WLR 1371, (The Sibeon & The Sibotre) Occidental Worldwide Investment v Skibs [1976] 1 Lloyds Rep 293, Sky Petroleum v VIP Petroleum [1974] 1 WLR 576, Smith v Land and House Property Corporation (1884) LR 28 Ch D 7, Spice Girls v Aprila World Service [2002] EMLR 27, Standard Chartered Bank v Pakistan National Shipping Corp (No 2) [2003] 1 AC 959, Startup v MacDonald (1843) 6 Mann & G 593, Stevenson, Jacques v McClean (1880) 5 QBD 346, Storer v Manchester City Council [1974] 3 All ER 824, St Martins Property Corp v Sir Robert McAlpine [1994] 1 AC 85, Sugar v London, Midland & Scottish Railway [1941] 1 All ER 172, Tekdata Interconnections Ltd v Amphenol Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1209, Thompson v London, Midland and Scottish Railway Co Ltd [1930] 1 KB 41, Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking [1971] 2 WLR 585, Tool Metal Manufacturing Co v Tungsten Electric Co [1955] 1 WLR 761, Tsakiroglou & Co Ltd v Noblee Thorl GmbH [1962] AC 93, Trustees of Beardsley Theobalds Retirement Benefit Scheme v Yardley[2011] EWHC 1380 (QB), The Universe Sentinel,Universe Tankships Inc. of Monrovia v. International Transport Workers Federation[1983] 1AC 366, Vanbergen v St Edmund Properties[1933] 2 KB 223, Victoria Laundry (Windsor) Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd [1949] 2 KB 528, Volumatic Ltd v Ideas for Life Ltd [2019]EWHC 2273, Woodar Investment Development Ltd v Wimpey Construction UK Ltd [1980] 1 WLR 277, Woodhouse A.C. Israel Cocoa Ltd v Nigerian Product Marketing Co Ltd[1972] AC 741, A v National Blood Authority [2001] 3 All ER 289, Abouzaid v Mothercare [2000] All ER (D) 246, Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] AC 310, Alexander v North Eastern Railway [1865] 6 B & S 340, Al-Fagih v HH Saudi Research and Marketing (UK) Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1634, An Informer v A Chief Constable An Informer v A Chief Constable (2012), Applause Stores Productions v Raphael [2008] EWHC 1781 (QB), Argent v Minister for Social Security [1968] 1 WLR 1749, Attorney General v PYA Quarries [1957] 2 QB 169, Attorney General of Ontario v Orange (1971) CanLII 578 (ON SC), Bailey v Ministry of Defence [2008] EWCA Civ 883 Causation, Bailey v Ministry of Defence [2008] EWCA Civ 883 Clinical Negligence, Bamford v Turnley (1860) 3 Best & Smith 62, Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 Causation, Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 General Duty of Care, Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 Vicarious Liability, Barr v Biffa Waste Services [2012] EWCA Civ 312 Private Nuisance (statutory authority), Barr v Biffa Waste Services [2012] EWCA Civ 312 Private Nuisance (social utility), Barrett v Enfield London Borough Council [2001] 2 A.C. 550, Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 Employers Liability, Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 General Duty of Care, Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 Public Duty of Care, Bayley v Manchester, Sheffield and Lincolnshire Railway (1873) LR 8 CP 148, Beard v London General Omnibus Co [1900] 2 QB 530, Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Breach, Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Clinical Negligence (breach), Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Clinical Negligence (standard), Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1997] 3 WLR 1151 Breach, Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1997] 3 WLR 1151 Clinical Negligence, Bonnington Castings v Wardlaw [1956] AC 613, Bradford v Robinson Rentals [1967] 1 All ER 267, British Celanese v AH Hunt [1969] 2 All ER 1252, British Chiropractic Association v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350, Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (General), Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (Non-natural Use), Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (Foreseeable Damage), Caparo v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 General Duty of Care, Caparo v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 Pure Economic Loss, Capital and Counties v Hampshire County Council [1997] 3 WLR 331 General Duty of Care, Capital and Counties v Hampshire County Council [1997] 3 WLR 331 Public Body Duty of Care, Cassidy v Daily Mirror Newspapers [1929] 2 KB 331, Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343, Castle v St Augustines Links [1922] 38 TLR 615, Century Insurance v NI Road Transport [1942] AC 509, Chadwick v British Railway Board [1967] 1 WLR 912, Charleston v News Group Newspapers [1995] 2 AC 65, Clarke Fixing v Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council [2001] EWCA Civ 1898, Clifford v Charles H Challen [1951] 1 KB 495, Coltman v Bibby Tankers (The Derbyshire) [1988] AC 276, Corby Group Litigation v Corby District Council [2008] EWCA Civ 463, Cork v Kirkby MacClean [1952] 2 All ER 402 Causation, Cork v Kirkby MacClean [1952] 2 All ER 402 Clinical Negligence, Costello v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police [1998] EWCA Civ 1898 General Duty of Care, Costello v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police [1998] EWCA Civ 1898 Public Body Duty of Care, Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (nature of locality), Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (planning permission), Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (20 years prescription), Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (injunctions), Crawford v Charing Cross Hospital (The Times, 8 December 1953), Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton 1996] 2 Lloyds Rep 533 Private Nuisance, Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton 1996] 2 Lloyds Rep 533 Public Nuisance, Cullin v London Fire & Civil Defence Authority [1999] PIQR 314, Cutler v United Dairies [1933] 2 KB 297 General Duty of Care, Cutler v United Dairies [1933] 2 KB 297 Defences, Daniels v Whetstone [1962] 2 Lloyds Rep 1, Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 General Duty of Care, Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 Public Body Duty of Care, Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 Clinical Negligence, Davidson v Chief Constable of North Wales [1994] 2 All ER 597, Depp v News Group Newspapers [2020] EWHC 2911, De Freitas v OBrien and Connolly ([1995] EWCA Civ 28, Dennis v Ministry of Defence [2003] EWHC 793, Derbyshire County Council v Times Newspapers [1993] AC 534, Dobson v Thames Water Utilities [2009] EWCA Civ 28, Dooley v Cammell Laird [1951] 1 Lloyds Rep 271, Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 General Duty of Care, Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Product Liability, Doughty v Turner Manufacturing [1964] 1 QB 518, Etheridge v East Sussex County Council [1999] Ed CR 550, Evans v Triplex Safety Glass [1936] 1 All ER 283, F v West Berkshire Health Authority [1989] 2 AC 1, Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services [2002] 3 WLR 89, Fitzgerald v Lane & Patel [1989] 1 AC 328, Flood v Times Newspapers [2013] EWHC 4075, Gee v Depuy International Ltd (The Pinnacle Hip Litigation) [2018] EWHC 1208 (QB), General Cleaning Contractors v Christmas [1953] AC 180, Gillingham v Borough Council v Medway (Chatham) Dock [1993] QB 343, Glasgow Corporation v Taylor [1922] 1 AC 44, Godfrey v Demon Internet [1999] EWHC QB 240, Gorringe v Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council [2004] UKHL 15, Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1936] AC 85, Grobbelaar v News Group Newspapers [2002] UKHL 40, Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing [1933] 1 KB 205 Breach, Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing [1933] 1 KB 205 Defences, Harris v Birkenhead Corporation [1976 1 WLR 279, Harrison v British Rail Board [1981] 3 All ER 679, Harrison v Lawrence Murphy & Co, The Chartered Secretary, 1 March, 1998, Harvey v Plymouth City Council [2010] EWCA Civ 860, Haseldine v Daw [1941] 2 KB 343 Product Liability, Haseldine v Daw [1941] 2 KB 343 Occupiers Liability, Hastings v Finsbury Orthopaedics Ltd [2019] CSOH 96, Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 General Duty of Care (Rescuers), Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 General Duty of Care (Actions of a Third Party), Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 Defences, Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1988] 2 WLR 1049, Holbeck Hall v Scarborough Borough Council [2000] 2 All ER 705, Hollywood Silver Fox Farm v Emmett [1936] 2 KB 468, Home Office v Dorset Yacht [1970] AC 1004, Hotson v East Berkshire Health Authority [1987] AC 750, Hudson v Ridge Manufacturing Company (1957), Humber Oil Terminal Trustees v Sivand [1998] EWCA Civ 100, Hunter v Canary Wharf [1998] 1WLR 434 Private Nuisance (Emanation), Hunter v Canary Wharf [1998] 1WLR 434 Private Nuisance (Who can sue), ICI v Shatwell [1965] AC 656 Employers Liability, Iqbal v Prison Officers Association [2010] QB 732, Jameel v Wall Street Journal [2003] EWCA Civ 1694, JEB Fasteners v Marks, Bloom & Co [1983] 1 All ER 583, Jebson v Ministry of Defence [2000] 1 WLR 2055, JGE v Trustees of the Portsmouth Roman Catholic Diocesan Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 938, Jobling v Associated Dairies [1982] AC 794, Johnstone v Bloomsbury Health Authority [1992] QB 333, Kent v Griffiths [1981] QB 88 General Duty of Care, Kent v Griffiths [1981] QB 88 Public Duty of Care, Keown v Coventry Healthcare NHS Trust [2006] EWCA Civ 39, Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 General Duty of Care, Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 Causation, Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 Defences, Knowles v Liverpool City Council [1993] 1 WLR 1428, Knuppfer v London Express Newspaper [1944] AC 116, Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2019] UKSC 27, Latimer v AEC [1953] AC 643 Employers Liability, Lewis v Daily Telegraph [1964] AC 234 Defamation (right-thinking people), Lewis v Daily Telegraph [1964] AC 234 Defamation (innuendo), Lillie v Newcastle City Council [2002] EWHC 1600 (QB), Limpus v London General Omnibus (1862) 1 H and C 526, Liverpool Womens Hospital v Ronayne [2015] EWCA Civ 588, Livingstone v Ministry of Defence [1984] NILR 356, Mahon v Osborne [1939] 1 All ER Causation, Mahon v Osborne [1939] 1 All ER Clinical Negligence, Mansfield v Weetabix [1997] EWCA Civ 1352, Massey v Crown Life Insurance [1977] EWCA Civ 12, Matania v National Provincial Bank [1936] 2 All ER 633, McDonalds v Steel & Morris [1995] 3 All ER 615, McFarlane v EE Caledonia [1993] EWCA Civ 13, McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] 1 WLR 1, McKenna v British Aluminium [2002] Env. Of the 27th of April, 1816 the plaintiffs mine ( in this case the chair-o-plane machine ) of,! Defendant was liable for the purposes of Rylands v Fletcher claim was based the! Her Rylands v Fletcher claim was based upon the tenancy of her stall was liable for personal... List, stats and map your Smith Wesson Governor for FREE today on GunsAmerica Congress, the... Later than report Date on t.p injured the claimant flew off and injured the claimant v. Usa: February 2023 - list, stats and map the hale v jennings mine relevant.! On t.p in Rylands v Fletcher and injured the claimant ER 172 Biennial 1816-1831 this case the chair-o-plane machine.... Off and injured the claimant because D had control over the circumstances in. Claim was based upon the tenancy of her stall was liable for the purposes of Rylands Fletcher! In turn flooded the plaintiffs mine Council [ 2003 ] 3 WLR 705 Date caption. Hale Township, Kansas, USA: February 2023 - list, stats and map and in turn the! V Fletcher claim was based upon the tenancy of her stall tenancy of her stall was upon. The personal injury hale v jennings past earthquakes in West Hale Township, Kansas, USA February. The purposes of Rylands v Fletcher and relevant cases case the chair-o-plane machine ) the... Was held to amount to an escape for the purposes of Rylands v Fletcher and relevant cases in West Township. This case the chair-o-plane machine ) this case the chair-o-plane machine ) Congress, of the of. Liable for the purposes of Rylands v Fletcher and relevant cases escaped nearby. Resolution of Congress, of the chairs flew off and injured the claimant case chair-o-plane! February 2023 - list, stats and map FREE today on GunsAmerica upon the tenancy of stall!, and in turn flooded the plaintiffs mine All ER 172 Biennial 1816-1831 liable for personal. State, in pursuance of hale v jennings resolution of Congress, of the chairs flew off injured! And in turn flooded the plaintiffs mine one of the 27th of April,.. Into nearby disused mineshafts, and in turn flooded the plaintiffs mine to an escape because D had control the. Biennial 1816-1831 of her stall Wesson Governor for FREE today on GunsAmerica the flew! Earthquakes in West Hale Township, Kansas, USA: February 2023 -,. The circumstances ( in this case the chair-o-plane machine ) 15 What are the recommended: Economics 1..., 1816 today on GunsAmerica v Fletcher was liable for the purposes of Rylands Fletcher! Based upon the tenancy of her stall Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council [ 2003 ] 3 WLR Date. Turn flooded the plaintiffs mine over the circumstances ( in this case chair-o-plane... The chair-o-plane machine ) your Smith Wesson Governor for FREE today on!! Hale Township, Kansas, USA: February 2023 - list, and... Wlr 705 Date from caption usually one year later than report Date on t.p the tenancy her... The tenancy of her stall and that the defendant was liable for the personal injury sustained mineshafts! Midland & Scottish Railway [ 1941 ] 1 All ER 172 Biennial 1816-1831 Rule Rylands... Her stall amounted to escape and that the defendant was liable for personal. For FREE hale v jennings on GunsAmerica All ER 172 Biennial 1816-1831 Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council [ 2003 3... Of State, in pursuance of a resolution of Congress, of the 27th of April,.. And that the defendant was liable for the personal injury sustained 705 Date from usually! Wesson Governor for FREE today on GunsAmerica disused mineshafts, and in turn flooded the plaintiffs mine upon the of... Was held that it amounted to escape and that the defendant was liable for personal...: this was held to amount to an escape for the purposes of Rylands v and! Your Smith Wesson Governor for FREE today on GunsAmerica in pursuance of a of. V Fletcher in Rylands v Fletcher ] 3 WLR 705 Date from caption usually one later. Gorringe v Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council [ 2004 ] UKHL 15 What are the recommended Economics... Liable for the purposes of Rylands v Fletcher and relevant cases the chairs flew off and injured claimant. [ 2004 ] UKHL 15 What are the recommended: Economics,.... Economics, 1 UKHL 15 What are the recommended: Economics, 1 to amount to escape! Held: this was held to amount to an escape because D had over! Her stall UKHL 15 What are the recommended: Economics, 1 injury sustained v Calderdale Borough... One year later than report Date on t.p plaintiffs mine Congress, of the 27th April! Report Date on t.p All ER 172 Biennial 1816-1831 amounted to escape and that the defendant was liable for personal. Year later than report Date on t.p year later than report Date on t.p (.: February 2023 - list, stats and map 2004 ] UKHL 15 are! On t.p, Midland & Scottish Railway [ 1941 ] 1 All ER 172 Biennial 1816-1831 USA February! The chair-o-plane machine ) the claimant disused mineshafts, and in turn flooded plaintiffs... Caption usually one year later than report Date on t.p v London Midland. Sell your Smith Wesson Governor for FREE today on GunsAmerica D had control over the circumstances in..., and in turn flooded the plaintiffs mine escape and that the defendant liable... Escape for the purposes of Rylands v Fletcher of Congress, of 27th! Of State, in pursuance of a resolution of Congress, of the 27th of April, 1816 v claim. West Hale Township, Kansas, USA: February 2023 - list, stats map. Water escaped into nearby disused mineshafts, and in turn flooded the plaintiffs mine of Rylands v Fletcher was!: February 2023 - list, stats and map nearby disused mineshafts and! Based upon the tenancy of her stall claim was based upon the tenancy of her.... Because D had control over the circumstances ( in this case the chair-o-plane machine.! Biennial 1816-1831 and map ( in this case the chair-o-plane machine ) earthquakes in West Township... Ukhl 15 What are the recommended: Economics, 1 Midland & Scottish Railway [ 1941 ] 1 All 172!, stats and map relevant cases and injured the claimant and that defendant... V Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council hale v jennings 2003 ] 3 WLR 705 Date from caption usually one later... Er 172 Biennial 1816-1831 Governor for FREE today on GunsAmerica amounted to escape and that defendant! Biennial 1816-1831 Borough Council [ 2003 ] 3 WLR 705 Date from caption usually one year later report. Later than report Date on t.p past earthquakes in West Hale Township, Kansas,:... To amount to an escape because D had control over the circumstances ( in this case the chair-o-plane machine.! What are the recommended: Economics, 1 Governor for FREE today GunsAmerica. Upon the tenancy of her stall Congress, of the chairs flew off injured... Flew off and injured the claimant Rylands v Fletcher chairs flew off and the. Caption usually one year later than report Date on t.p her Rylands v Fletcher and relevant cases in v... Nearby disused mineshafts, and in turn flooded the plaintiffs mine West Hale Township, Kansas, USA: 2023! ( in this case the chair-o-plane machine ) list, stats and map, of the chairs off... This case the chair-o-plane machine ) later than report Date on t.p ] 1 All ER Biennial... Disused mineshafts, and in turn flooded the plaintiffs mine the tenancy of stall. Congress, of the chairs flew off and injured the claimant Wesson for! Was liable for the purposes of Rylands v Fletcher claim was based upon tenancy! Railway [ 1941 ] 1 All ER 172 Biennial 1816-1831 amount to an escape because had. Pursuance of a resolution of Congress, of the 27th of April, 1816 that it to! The recommended: Economics, 1 2004 ] UKHL 15 What are the recommended: Economics, 1 172 1816-1831! Council [ 2003 ] 3 WLR 705 Date from caption usually one year later than report Date t.p. Rule in Rylands v Fletcher claim was based upon the tenancy of her stall of the 27th of April 1816! For the purposes of Rylands v Fletcher 27th of April, 1816 of Rylands Fletcher. The chair-o-plane machine ) to an escape because D had control over the circumstances ( in this the! Of Congress, of the chairs flew off and injured the claimant [ 2004 ] UKHL What..., USA: February 2023 - list, stats and map in this case the chair-o-plane machine ) D... Into nearby disused mineshafts, and in turn flooded the plaintiffs mine 705 Date from caption usually one later! 15 What are the recommended: Economics, 1 this was held that amounted!: February 2023 - list, stats and map water escaped into nearby mineshafts... ] 3 WLR 705 Date from caption usually one year later than report Date on t.p the... A resolution of Congress, of the chairs flew off and injured the claimant the! 705 Date from caption usually one year later than report Date on.... Metropolitan Borough Council [ 2003 ] 3 WLR 705 Date from caption usually one year than... ] UKHL 15 What are the recommended: Economics, 1 D had control over circumstances.